<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Glorfindel of Gondolin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cuivienen.org/gondolin/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cuivienen.org/gondolin</link>
	<description>Almost always contra the WSJ editorial board</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:31:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stomp! by Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.cuivienen.org/gondolin/?p=654&#038;cpage=1#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuivienen.org/gondolin/?p=654#comment-148</guid>
		<description>Luka Bloom&#039;s group is great. But, hay, how can you go wrong with China Mieville on the fiddle, er I mean the violin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luka Bloom&#8217;s group is great. But, hay, how can you go wrong with China Mieville on the fiddle, er I mean the violin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How quickly will you die after this stab wound? by kayvon</title>
		<link>http://www.cuivienen.org/gondolin/?p=616&#038;cpage=1#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>kayvon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 17:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuivienen.org/gondolin/?p=616#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Yo,

Agreed.  With respect to penetrating STAB wounds to the chest, pts. can die immediately, or be talking to you in the ED with no signs of shock.  Stab wounds are very unique, and there really is no  way to know when this man died (short of being cut entirley in two).  Interestingly, The highest survival rate from resusitative ED thoracotomies is with pts suffering from low energy penetrating trauma to the thorax (i.e. stab wounds).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo,</p>
<p>Agreed.  With respect to penetrating STAB wounds to the chest, pts. can die immediately, or be talking to you in the ED with no signs of shock.  Stab wounds are very unique, and there really is no  way to know when this man died (short of being cut entirley in two).  Interestingly, The highest survival rate from resusitative ED thoracotomies is with pts suffering from low energy penetrating trauma to the thorax (i.e. stab wounds).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How quickly will you die after this stab wound? by k</title>
		<link>http://www.cuivienen.org/gondolin/?p=616&#038;cpage=1#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 19:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuivienen.org/gondolin/?p=616#comment-133</guid>
		<description>Actually, it&#039;s a bench trial. Eek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it&#8217;s a bench trial. Eek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Red Dead Redemption by Carey</title>
		<link>http://www.cuivienen.org/gondolin/?p=571&#038;cpage=1#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Carey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 06:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuivienen.org/gondolin/?p=571#comment-132</guid>
		<description>Kayvon -- if you get it let me know if you like it.

I&#039;ve gotta psych myself up for a) buying a console, and b) buying a TV to plug it into.  So I&#039;m at least a couple of days away from actually playing anything...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kayvon &#8212; if you get it let me know if you like it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve gotta psych myself up for a) buying a console, and b) buying a TV to plug it into.  So I&#8217;m at least a couple of days away from actually playing anything&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Atul Gawande at Stanford: the medical-industrial complex cometh** by kayvon</title>
		<link>http://www.cuivienen.org/gondolin/?p=585&#038;cpage=1#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>kayvon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 02:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuivienen.org/gondolin/?p=585#comment-131</guid>
		<description>Yo,

First I think Gawande was blowing alot of hot air into the lungs of these new grads.  I mean what system really runs seamlessly?  Surely not medicine, and surely not in the near future.  I think alot of this speech was lip service, which is my impression of Gawande from reading some of his writings.  I don&#039;t think he really intends everything in the practice of medicine to run as smooth as the gas flow in the fuel injection of a lexus or the power seats in a BMW (do BMWs have power seats?).  I really think he is trying to portray a vision of the implementation, regulation and monitoring of quality in medicine across all providers, hospitals, technology and pharmacy.
His reference to the &quot;Individual craftsmen brewing plans for whatever patient comes through the door,&quot; I believe is referring to physician accountability.  For example recall that less than 5% of what we do in medicine is truly evidence based-this allows providers a wide scope to practice medicine, some of which is borderline malpractice.  Thus to implement and regulate a range of the standard of care within the realm of known evidence is reasonable (for example practice guidelines with the review of the current literature). However by no means would this be a perfect system, and likely would be fraught with many holes that even the best seamstress or surgeon would not be able to mend.
    One problem I have with his essay, and what I personally feel is the root of our medical systems&#039; flaw is its intrinsic conflict between profit and patient care.  Gawande states technology and science have changed medicine-sure.  However, it was money and profit earned from the sick that fueled the technology and science in the early 20th century, and still does to date.  These two opposing endpoints (profit and the welfare of the patient), cannot and will not be in harmony, and thus we will always struggle with efficiency and accountability despite our best efforts to improve quality by normalizing/intergrating our goal-directed therapies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo,</p>
<p>First I think Gawande was blowing alot of hot air into the lungs of these new grads.  I mean what system really runs seamlessly?  Surely not medicine, and surely not in the near future.  I think alot of this speech was lip service, which is my impression of Gawande from reading some of his writings.  I don&#8217;t think he really intends everything in the practice of medicine to run as smooth as the gas flow in the fuel injection of a lexus or the power seats in a BMW (do BMWs have power seats?).  I really think he is trying to portray a vision of the implementation, regulation and monitoring of quality in medicine across all providers, hospitals, technology and pharmacy.<br />
His reference to the &#8220;Individual craftsmen brewing plans for whatever patient comes through the door,&#8221; I believe is referring to physician accountability.  For example recall that less than 5% of what we do in medicine is truly evidence based-this allows providers a wide scope to practice medicine, some of which is borderline malpractice.  Thus to implement and regulate a range of the standard of care within the realm of known evidence is reasonable (for example practice guidelines with the review of the current literature). However by no means would this be a perfect system, and likely would be fraught with many holes that even the best seamstress or surgeon would not be able to mend.<br />
    One problem I have with his essay, and what I personally feel is the root of our medical systems&#8217; flaw is its intrinsic conflict between profit and patient care.  Gawande states technology and science have changed medicine-sure.  However, it was money and profit earned from the sick that fueled the technology and science in the early 20th century, and still does to date.  These two opposing endpoints (profit and the welfare of the patient), cannot and will not be in harmony, and thus we will always struggle with efficiency and accountability despite our best efforts to improve quality by normalizing/intergrating our goal-directed therapies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Red Dead Redemption by kayvon</title>
		<link>http://www.cuivienen.org/gondolin/?p=571&#038;cpage=1#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>kayvon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 01:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuivienen.org/gondolin/?p=571#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Yo,

Red Dead Redemption (RDR) does look like a pretty bad ass game.  I must say Rockstar (creators of Red Dead Redmeption), did an excellent job with Grand Theft Auto IV--one of my favorite xbox games (yes I have some vices and this game is one of them).  Im not much of a gamer but like GTA IV, RDR looks too good to pass up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo,</p>
<p>Red Dead Redemption (RDR) does look like a pretty bad ass game.  I must say Rockstar (creators of Red Dead Redmeption), did an excellent job with Grand Theft Auto IV&#8211;one of my favorite xbox games (yes I have some vices and this game is one of them).  Im not much of a gamer but like GTA IV, RDR looks too good to pass up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FCC: what doing its job looks like by Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.cuivienen.org/gondolin/?p=417&#038;cpage=1#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 18:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuivienen.org/gondolin/?p=417#comment-128</guid>
		<description>Hey, I&#039;m checking to see if my email works here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I&#8217;m checking to see if my email works here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on  by kayvon alizadeh</title>
		<link>http://www.cuivienen.org/gondolin/?p=457&#038;cpage=1#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>kayvon alizadeh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 03:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuivienen.org/gondolin/?p=457#comment-119</guid>
		<description>I must say that the &quot;pay for performance,&quot; model reminds me of third grade again, when my mom would give me an extra special desert if I took the trash out and did the dishes in the same night .  I mean what happened to altruism?  What happened to wanting to take care of patients at their worst, most vulnerable state?  Why are the most competitive residencies those that are life-style and reinbursement heavy?
  Call me a communist, but I believe all physicians should be salaried equally for hours worked-period (less the cosmetic surgeons, which could really be classified as glorified barbers).  I dont care if you scored 295 on your boards, I want to know if you genuinely CARE for people--that&#039;s what it&#039;s all about.  I will always remember what a pediatric cardiothoraic surgeon told me once, he said, &quot;a great doctor is a concerned doctor, not a smart doctor.&quot;  In my 7 years in surgery nothing has been more true.  I&#039;ve seen average intelligence people become some of the best surgeons/physicians, and not infrequently super smart guys demostrate their lack of interest in doctoring and make major errors in patient care.
    It&#039;s not surprising to me that financial incentives have found their way into medicine; we are a money crazy society, and those insurance companies dangle a nice gold-painted carrot for all doctors to bite.
   Its not that im against captialism.  I just think if you want to make money then go into investment banking (maybe I should have done this?).  If you want to care for pts. then go into medicine.  I mean isn&#039;t that what every person applying to medical school writes on their personal statements-&#039;I want to care, I want to help, i&#039;m generous&#039; etc etc, not &#039;I want to be a radiologist making $40,000 every two weeks with weekends off&#039;?  Maybe we as physicians should be required to carry our personal statements in our not-so-white coats at all times?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say that the &#8220;pay for performance,&#8221; model reminds me of third grade again, when my mom would give me an extra special desert if I took the trash out and did the dishes in the same night .  I mean what happened to altruism?  What happened to wanting to take care of patients at their worst, most vulnerable state?  Why are the most competitive residencies those that are life-style and reinbursement heavy?<br />
  Call me a communist, but I believe all physicians should be salaried equally for hours worked-period (less the cosmetic surgeons, which could really be classified as glorified barbers).  I dont care if you scored 295 on your boards, I want to know if you genuinely CARE for people&#8211;that&#8217;s what it&#8217;s all about.  I will always remember what a pediatric cardiothoraic surgeon told me once, he said, &#8220;a great doctor is a concerned doctor, not a smart doctor.&#8221;  In my 7 years in surgery nothing has been more true.  I&#8217;ve seen average intelligence people become some of the best surgeons/physicians, and not infrequently super smart guys demostrate their lack of interest in doctoring and make major errors in patient care.<br />
    It&#8217;s not surprising to me that financial incentives have found their way into medicine; we are a money crazy society, and those insurance companies dangle a nice gold-painted carrot for all doctors to bite.<br />
   Its not that im against captialism.  I just think if you want to make money then go into investment banking (maybe I should have done this?).  If you want to care for pts. then go into medicine.  I mean isn&#8217;t that what every person applying to medical school writes on their personal statements-&#8217;I want to care, I want to help, i&#8217;m generous&#8217; etc etc, not &#8216;I want to be a radiologist making $40,000 every two weeks with weekends off&#8217;?  Maybe we as physicians should be required to carry our personal statements in our not-so-white coats at all times?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Match Day by kayvon</title>
		<link>http://www.cuivienen.org/gondolin/?p=420&#038;cpage=1#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>kayvon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuivienen.org/gondolin/?p=420#comment-105</guid>
		<description>What about all the suckas who matched in Gen Surg?  I guess I would congratulate them if they truly belive in sadomasochism.

Peace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about all the suckas who matched in Gen Surg?  I guess I would congratulate them if they truly belive in sadomasochism.</p>
<p>Peace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Showy dogs; bah.  Gimme a dog that can run. by Carey</title>
		<link>http://www.cuivienen.org/gondolin/?p=361&#038;cpage=1#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Carey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 00:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cuivienen.org/gondolin/?p=361#comment-97</guid>
		<description>Yep, I go running with my dog a lot, and he always does better than I do.  He starts out too fast for me, then he speeds up.  :)  No, actually he&#039;s a great dog to run with you on a leash -- after he gets some of his energy out by sprinting way too much at the beginning of the run, he&#039;ll settle into whatever pace you&#039;re at and maintain it for WAY longer than you can.  I always feel like a failure when I run with my dog, which is a good thing!

And yes, the way I see it is, if you need a dog that can fit in your lap, you&#039;re better off getting a cat.

I agree that a high-energy herding dog like a collie would need to get outside a lot.  Unless you could put him in a day care during the day that would let him play outside, that poor doggie would be in a world of hurt.  And good day care for doggies costs a ton of money, too.

But hey, I&#039;ve been surprised how well we&#039;ve done with our dog.  Living in Chicago and Seattle, we&#039;ve managed to keep him healthy and active.  You just manage to find ways to do it, once you&#039;ve committed to a dog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, I go running with my dog a lot, and he always does better than I do.  He starts out too fast for me, then he speeds up.  <img src='http://www.cuivienen.org/gondolin/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   No, actually he&#8217;s a great dog to run with you on a leash &#8212; after he gets some of his energy out by sprinting way too much at the beginning of the run, he&#8217;ll settle into whatever pace you&#8217;re at and maintain it for WAY longer than you can.  I always feel like a failure when I run with my dog, which is a good thing!</p>
<p>And yes, the way I see it is, if you need a dog that can fit in your lap, you&#8217;re better off getting a cat.</p>
<p>I agree that a high-energy herding dog like a collie would need to get outside a lot.  Unless you could put him in a day care during the day that would let him play outside, that poor doggie would be in a world of hurt.  And good day care for doggies costs a ton of money, too.</p>
<p>But hey, I&#8217;ve been surprised how well we&#8217;ve done with our dog.  Living in Chicago and Seattle, we&#8217;ve managed to keep him healthy and active.  You just manage to find ways to do it, once you&#8217;ve committed to a dog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

