« Immigration and the farm economy in Fresno | Main | Old folks and young folks »

The war on what?

Commenting on "the generally unhinged condition of political discourse in America", Brian Leiter nails the bullseye:

One really can't repeat this often enough: there is no "war on terror," not only because you can't wage war on a technique, but because there is no single agent of terrorism motivated by a unitary set of concerns. The whole "war on terror" is a fraud, and anyone who speaks of such a fake war should be laughed out of serious society. [Emphasis in original.]

This is about as non-partisan a bit of common sense as you'll find. That so few people on both the left and right acknowledge it is scary. What happens to a democracy when "we the People" are all out to lunch? We're finding out day by day.

(I don't think Leiter's quite as effective when he describes Bush's characterization of the "enemy" as "a construct worthy of Tolkien." Tolkien's fiction was magisterial, at once awesomely imaginative and profoundly relevant. Bush's fantasy stories, in contrast, are much more pedestrian -- on the level of, say, Sara Douglass' weaker novels. . . .)

Comments

By saying "Sara Douglass' weaker novels...", you imply that at some point she produced strong ones.

Bzzzt. Wrong.

I tried to trackback, but I guess it didn't work. So here is the linked-to post: "War on Terminology".

Same here. Tried to trackback, didn't work, here's the link:

http://spvgg.blogspot.com/2005/12/panopticum-legal-analysis-of-nsa.html

Hope all is well!

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)