« Advantage: Bush | Main | Merck pulls Vioxx... »

Bush/Kerry debate

I think the actual exchange of views was pretty shallow--no surprise there--but it was clear that one candidate was a committed multilateralist while the other was not. I suppose this clear differentiation of views is about as much as you can hope for in these overly-scripted debates, so I'll take it.

I do wish Kerry had made the case for multilateralism as an important way to build America's strength, which might have been more appealing to undecided voters. Just a few words to the effect that, "goodwill in the international community is a much richer source of American power than Bush's 'missile defense' nonsense."

Anyway, the thing that counts is the post-debate spin, where the pundits tell the American people what to think. That spin seems to be going for Kerry.


Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bush/Kerry debate:

» The no debate spin zone from Julie Saltman
Edit II...Carey agrees that it's all about power. [Read More]

» Weekly Law School Roundup #29 from Notes from the (Legal) Underground
This Week: The First Presidential Debate, In Which Your Editor Hunts Down Law-School Punditry from Weblogs Across the Land, Then Excerpts It Here For Your Enjoyment So Who Won? The Irish Trojan "The impact? Kerry has to gain, I think. [Read More]